[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Public WebGL] blitFramebuffer behaviour
This was not a spec discussion, this was a query, and the answer was
in our spec text for blitFramebuffer.
There doesn't seem to be any deviation between pre-release versions of
the browsers, at least according to your testcase.
Thank you for filing the crash bug.
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 3:27 PM Tarek Sherif <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> That's all I was asking for. I'm curious why you think there's a public mailing list if you feel the spec should only be discussed among browser devs.
> Tarek Sherif
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 17:27, Jeff Gilbert <email@example.com> wrote:
> > FWIW, Chrome is correct:
> > WebGL 2 spec for blitFramebuffer:
> > "If this function attempts to blit to a missing attachment of a
> > complete framebuffer, nothing is blitted to that attachment and no
> > error is generated per Drawing to a Missing Attachment.
> > If this function attempts to read from a missing attachment of a
> > complete framebuffer, and at least one draw buffer has an image to be
> > blitted, an INVALID_OPERATION error is generated per Reading from a
> > Missing Attachment. "
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 2:21 PM Jeff Gilbert firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > > If you think a browser's behavior is incorrect, file a bug with that browser.
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 1:25 PM Tarek Sherif email@example.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > This was not a bug report. My first response was to file the bug report on your bug tracker, as I mentioned. I was unaware of the concern with crash bugs, and I'll keep that in mind in the future.
> > > > The purpose of sending to the mailing list was to discuss whether Chrome's behavior is correct.
> > > > Tarek Sherif
> > > > http://tareksherif.net/
> > > > https://www.biodigital.com/
> > > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> > > > On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 15:13, Jeff Gilbert firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi.
> > > > > Your first response to finding a browser bug should not be posting to
> > > > > public lists about it. For behavior differences, reporting the bug
> > > > > against one of the browsers is sufficient, since we constantly work to
> > > > > guarantee cross-browser compatibility. In the bug filed against
> > > > > browsers, browser devs will weigh in on what the proper behavior
> > > > > should be, and will either fix it in their browser, or direct you to
> > > > > file a bug against the browser they feel is out of spec. (Or maybe
> > > > > browser devs will file that bug with the other browser)
> > > > > Crash bugs in particular should not be publicized widely. Crash bugs
> > > > > can be symptoms of security vulnerabilities, so a certain amount of
> > > > > care should be taken.
> > > > > I will now be taking a look at the bug reported to Firefox, and, as is
> > > > > usual for this sort of issue, ensuring that behavior matches the spec,
> > > > > both in Firefox, and across browsers.
> > > > > Please do not use this list for bug reports unless the normal approach
> > > > > to filing bugs falls short.
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:22 AM Tarek Sherif email@example.com wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > I just reported a bug to the Firefox devs about blitFramebuffer causing the browser tab to crash: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1506840
> > > > > > Essentially, if the read fbo has colour and depth attachments, while the draw fbo has only a color attachement, and the mask is COLOR_BUFFER_BIT | DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT, the tab will crash in Firefox. Minimal example: https://github.com/tsherif/webgl2bugs/blob/master/firefox/ff-blit-bug.html
> > > > > > Chrome ignores the depth buffer in this case, but I'm not sure that behaviour is correct. The spec suggests it should be an INVALID_OPERATION error (section 4.3.3): "Calling BlitFramebuffer will result in an INVALID_OPERATION error if mask includes DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT or STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT, and the source and destination depth and stencil buffer formats do not match."
> > > > > > I don't mind either way, as long as the behaviour is consistent across both browsers.
> > > > > > Tarek Sherif
> > > > > > http://tareksherif.net/
> > > > > > https://www.biodigital.com/
You are currently subscribed to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe, send an email to email@example.com with
the following command in the body of your email: