[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Public WebGL] WEBGL_multiview discussion

It's customary to reflect the essentials of a mirrored extension if there's significant WebGL behavioral changes.

On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Olli Etuaho <oetuaho@nvidia.com> wrote:

I agree it’s unintended usage of the extension template, but I’m not sure what a better third alternative would be. Would others have suggestions on how to organize the proposal better?

Make the extension host all changes including added tokens and functions on its IDL. Make another pull request to change the WebGL specification which includes the text in the specification. People who want to do forward compatibility can polyfill the forward core changes from the extension object.


Please read the spec carefully.

Does not include an errors section where errors are usually included, please draft the specification more carefully. the XML processor has a directive to describe errors. The errors described in the overviews sections is... informative, but not formative in regards to errors.

It says that it is forbidden to call drawBuffer() when an FBO is bound.

See missing errors section.

Also consult the XSLT for the sections: