[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Public WebGL] EXT_texture_storage

I agree that it'd be better to reject this extension rather than move it forward. Now that WebGL 2.0's on the verge of shipping in multiple browsers, I think we should encourage more implementations rather than continue to add extensions to WebGL 1.0.

On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Zhenyao Mo <zmo@chromium.org> wrote:
My main concern is we won't have full EXT_texture_storage on top of DX9, on which some WebGL1 implementations are based.

To me, a better path is just to switch to WebGL2 whenever it's possible, where texture storage is part of core.

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 8:54 AM, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com> wrote:
No change has occured on https://www.khronos.org/registry/webgl/extensions/proposals/EXT_texture_storage/ since September 2015

Can this extension be elevated to draft?