[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Public WebGL] Propose moving EXT_color_buffer_float to community approved

I have no objection against moving this extension to community approved. In particular I think it is non controversial to move it to community approved because:
I believe it would be permitted to jump an extension from draft to khronos ratified if the khronos board would wish to do so?

On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com> wrote:
WebGL community,

I'd like to propose moving the EXT_color_buffer_float extension to community approved:

While WebGL 2.0 implementations aren't on by default yet in browsers, there is already a conformance test for this extension; it is passing on multiple prototype implementations; and the extension will definitely be needed once the spec is finalized.

Having it as a draft extension is causing some developers confusion.

Any comments or objections?