Hey Ken,Thank you for the clarification. Do you have a timeframe until evaluations by interested parties will conclude?On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 11:09 AM, Kenneth Russell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Florian,
While Owen's no longer working on this piece of functionality,
Artillery is still investigating its potential. It's been mentioned
that it may also be useful for WebVR scenarios in order to deliver the
head tracker's most up-to-date orientation directly to the end of the
Our team is focused 100% right now on getting a WebGL 2.0 prototype in
the hands of developers, and we don't have the time to move this
extension forward right now. Nonetheless, since the idea may have some
value, let's leave it as a proposal for the time being.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:28 AM, Florian Bösch <email@example.com> wrote:
> Owen Glofcheski is no longer reachable under his previous mail address. The
> issue has also not rejected. And no further input has been provided despite
> the deadline passing by a generous margin and repeated polling.
> Ken please clarify the holdup.
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Florian Bösch <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Florian Bösch <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> Are we going to fail reaching consensus on the requirement to have this
>>> Can we reach consensus to provide it without an extension?
>>> I would propose that in case of #2 we can reject this extension. In case
>>> #1 persists or no further input is provided until February 24th 2015, that
>>> this extension be rejected, a suitable pull request has been prepared:
>> No further discussion on WEBGL_subscribe_uniform has ensued, and no
>> further input has been provided. A previously set deadline for comment
>> (February 24th 2015) has now passed by a month, and from this I surmise that
>> this extension proposal is abandoned.
>> Ken, I strongly suggest merging this pull request which moves that
>> extension to rejected: https://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/pull/828