[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Public WebGL] Re: extensions status

We expose both of these, where supported. We even expose WEBGL_color_buffer_float on ANGLE presently.

We have not withdrawn our implementation, and I am curious how this idea came about.

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:08 PM, Florian Bösch <pyalot@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Kenneth Russell <kbr@google.com> wrote:
>> No intent to implement these. I don't remember all of the issues we
>> ran into, but when we investigated adding support I recall multiple
>> issues in ANGLE that made us abandon the effort.
> Excellent, thank you. I propose to reject these extensions:
> https://github.com/KhronosGroup/WebGL/pull/846
> They will not land in ANGLE (and so support would be difficult/impossible in
> Chrome/Firefox)
> Google will not implement them
> Firefox has withdrawn their initial implementation (I interprete this as
> tacit approval of mozilla to reject these extensions)

I'd like to hear Mozilla's explicit feedback on this before rejecting
these extensions.

> Microsoft has not stated their position but is unlikely to follow where
> Chrome and Firefox do not go
> Apple has not stated their position, but is unlikely to follow where Chrome
> and Firefox do not go (and they also use ANGLE)
>> On the other hand we
>> will absolutely implement EXT_color_buffer_float for WebGL 2.0.
> That's understood.