[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Public WebGL] Any objections to moving ATC and PVRTC ext specs to draft status?


I would like to know if there is any objection to moving the ATC and
PVRTC extension specifications from proposal to draft status?

The proposals can be found here:


For the PVRTC extension, notice that there is a technical difficulty
that needs to be resolved first: the OpenGL ES extension spec talks
about a "1:1 aspect ratio" requirement. This seems to require
width==height, something that the current WebGL extension spec doesn't


You are currently subscribed to public_webgl@khronos.org.
To unsubscribe, send an email to majordomo@khronos.org with
the following command in the body of your email:
unsubscribe public_webgl