On Sep 7, 2012, at 3:42 PM, Florian Bösch <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
We should be extremely clear about the status of any technique for encoding or transcoding to the ATC format. The article sited claims only to have used "public sources", but it's not clear if those sources include only valid (non-proprietary) information. I understand the strong desire to have an acceptable compressed texture format. But we really do need to make sure the one(s) chosen can be included in the spec free of any undeclared encumbrances. IANAL, but I know that not being careful about this will almost certainly bite us in the ass later...