Re: [Public WebGL] WEBGL_dynamic_texture extension proposal

[Mark Callow <callow_mark@hicorp.co.jp>]

    On 13/07/2012 16:50, Mark Callow wrote:

And below is Acorn's reply to my reply.

Based on feedback from you all I am going to recast WEBGL_dynamic_texture as wrapping GL_NV_EGL_stream_consumer_external

    Before I go ahead and change the draft I want to know if people
    comfortable having an extension that mirrors a non-Khronos OpenGL ES
    extension? As I said it

... is basically OES_EGL_image_external without the bits we don't want ...

    The reason it is not yet a Khronos extension is, I think, because
    discussion continues on a cross-platform way to bind the EGLStream
    to an OpenMAX producer. NVIDIA needed to ship a product hence it has
    come out first with the NV prefix.
    
    Given that the important parts are available in an OES extension I
    don't think mirroring this should be a concern. The reason for
    choosing this over OES_EGL_image_external is that it discusses
    latching (acquiring) image frames, something that is at the heart of
    WEBGL_dynamic_texture and includes a rule to having sampling return
    black pixels when no frame is latched. The features described that
    go beyond OES_EGL_image_external can be easily implemented in the
    browser when WEBGL_dynamic_texture is implemented on top of
    OES_EGL_image_external or TEXTURE_2D.
    
    Regards
    
        -Mark

--

注意：この電子メールには、株式会社エイチアイの機密情報が含まれている場合が有ります。正式なメール受信者では無い場合はメール複製、 再配信または情報の使用を固く禁じております。エラー、手違いでこのメールを受け取られましたら削除を行い配信者にご連絡をお願いいたし ます。

NOTE: This electronic mail message may contain confidential and privileged information from HI Corporation. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, photocopying, distribution or use of the contents of the received information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete this message and all related copies.