[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Public WebGL] WEBGL_dynamic_texture extension proposal

On 06/07/2012 02:11, Gregg Tavares (社用) wrote:
A couple more comments

* samplerExternalOES or samplerDynamicTextureWEBGL?

I'm just wondering if there will be any future conflict. I don't want to end up in a case where we some how have to distinguish between real uses of samplesExternalOES and ones that have to be re-written for WebGL dynamic textures.

But maybe that will never come up?

* #extension OES_EGL_image_external : enable or #extension WEBGL_dynamic_texture : enable?

Similarly, do I need to worry about any future conflicts? 

Conflicts seem unlikely. OES_EGL_image_external is not going to change. The functionality exposed in WEBGL_dynamic_texture is identical. I don't have any strong feeling about it which is why the issue is unresolved.

Regards

    -Mark
--
注意：この電子メールには、株式会社エイチアイの機密情報が含まれている場合が有ります。正式なメール受信者では無い場合はメール複製、 再配信または情報の使用を固く禁じております。エラー、手違いでこのメールを受け取られましたら削除を行い配信者にご連絡をお願いいたし ます。

NOTE: This electronic mail message may contain confidential and privileged information from HI Corporation. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, photocopying, distribution or use of the contents of the received information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete this message and all related copies.