[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Public WebGL] Ambiguity and Non-deterministicness in the WebGL Spec

On Dec 12, 2010, at 7:24 PM, Cedric Vivier wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:53, Mark Callow <callow_mark@hicorp.co.jp> wrote:
>> As I pointed out in a previous e-mail not all applications use glClear()
>> because their other rendering will fill the entire buffer. In those cases
>> following the above is overhead that cannot be optimized away. When I was at
>> SGI, we used to go to enormous lengths to make sure the clear operation was
>> fast because it has an enormous effect on the overall frame-rate. It feels
>> really painful to be introducing extra clears.
>> I also don't quite understand this part
> Same here, also aren't we going towards exposing a
> presentFramebuffer() or equivalent?
> The paragraph defining how/when the drawing buffer is presented is
> confusing at best imho.
> When does the compositing happens exactly? Does it always happen right
> after the current Javascript timeslice?
> Granted a "present()" would probably have to be asynchronous
> internally, it provides a very clear definition of frame presentation
> semantics.

We've decided to leave the presentation time undefined. This allows different implementations to optimize the the given graphics driver behavior.


You are currently subscribed to public_webgl@khronos.org.
To unsubscribe, send an email to majordomo@khronos.org with
the following command in the body of your email: