[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Public WebGL] Proposed change to WebGL Event definition
- To: Kenneth Russell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: [Public WebGL] Proposed change to WebGL Event definition
- From: Chris Marrin <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:16:55 -0700
- Cc: public webgl <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTin=52evOB_NF9-Ht-EmrS7OTTCb+jHtjXhvW_pA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <33F15A1B-FF87-44F1-ABA3-632494FA649A@apple.com> <AANLkTikLAH9-fhr0qmsjUnZLyMxwGT4pkq69GO8smQemail@example.com> <817D1DD8-125C-44B0-95FF-C288EECB06E0@apple.com> <AANLkTikbe2Rd5-EvxyXjdjruFVgNrayhy2CcVAdgr967@mail.gmail.com> <BAB0DBAA-252E-41CB-A41F-9ABD93248AAC@apple.com> <AANLkTimjbRTS_N2UXja9JRgqX-7AxnA2Rvset-v1j-X9@mail.gmail.com> <10C92111-C1E5-429F-AF48-D4737C07BCEE@apple.com> <FE76D408-FDF8-4CB1-9BB0-4AEC13C9DC49@apple.com> <AANLkTi=qSet-f=Wy99Wqcghfedp8+98K70d632xQbuZfirstname.lastname@example.org> <AANLkTi=dwwjBO5mPz_2PJGyHY2gfR6qQCK5abcT7HrFy@mail.gmail.com> <044681C5-76B1-4D4B-AF5C-4BD34203350B@apple.com> <AANLkTin=52evOB_NF9-Ht-EmrS7OTTCb+jHtjXhvW_pA@mail.gmail.com>
- Sender: email@example.com
On Oct 19, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Kenneth Russell wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Chris Marrin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> On Sep 3, 2010, at 10:08 PM, Cedric Vivier wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 09:40, Kenneth Russell <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Chris Marrin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>> I've revised the event section (5.14). Please review.
>>> Sorry for not realizing this before, but the "NOT_AVAILABLE" status
>>> code seems pretty useless, because if the web browser is so old that
>>> it doesn't support WebGL, then it definitely won't support delivery of
>>> the webglcontextcreationerror event.
>> NOT_AVAILABLE "WebGL is not implemented or not enabled in this browser"
>> I think the current meaning is confusing (and indeed useless).
>> IIRC the original planned intent for this status code, meaning should be
>> something like :
>> "WebGL is currently disabled or temporarily unavailable because of high
>> resource usage by other tabs/programs."
>> I think that's another status code. Perhaps reasons for failure are:
>> - WebGL is not implemented (the event will never fire)
>> - WebGL is disabled by the browser
>> - WebGL is disabled by request of the user
>> - Hardware is insufficient for running WebGL content
>> - System is unable to run WebGL content because of other system constraints.
>> Maybe it is a bad idea to have status codes. There could be many more
>> reasons for not being able to use WebGL content. So maybe we should do as
>> Ken suggests and only have a status message. That way the user agent can put
>> any necessary recommendations into the string. The browsers would have L11N
>> issues, but that is probably manageable.
>> The unfortunate thing is that, if you don't have WebGL support at all, this
>> event will never fire. You will simply get a null return from getContext().
>> You' have to set up a timer and if it fires without any event being
>> generated you know you don't have WebGL. That's a hack.
>> I think the right way to handle that is to add a media query for WebGL.
>> We've made a proposal to add media queries for CSS animations, transitions,
>> and transforms. These are all supported in WebKit today. It would be easy to
>> add one for 'webgl'. You can run the query from JS and know you don't have
>> WebGL without having to call getContext(). But the really nice thing about
>> media queries is that you can use them in CSS style sheets. If WebGL is
>> missing you can style the page differently for, for instance, not take up
>> the space for the WebGL canvas.
>> So the proposal is to get rid of statusCode and add a media query for
>> 'webgl'. I will talk to dino, who is pushing the media query extensions
>> spec, about this as well.
> Resurrecting this thread. I would like to remove the status codes from
> WebGLContextEvent for the reasons I cited earlier. Are there any
> objections to my doing so?
None from me
You are currently subscribed to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe, send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the following command in the body of your email: