[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Public WebGL] Re: WebGL spec modifications for D3D



Looks good -- wide lines and smooth lines would need to be removed for
native D3D9 rendering, but they're easy to emulate (e.g., using
ID3DXLine).


On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Vangelis Kokkevis <vangelis@google.com> wrote:
> I finally got around to checking into the spec the restrictions to WebGL
> necessitated by the D3D port.  They are in sections 6.5 through 6.9 of the
> spec document.  Please have a look and let me know if there are any
> objections or omissions.
> Cheers,
> Vangelis
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Vangelis Kokkevis <vangelis@google.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Following up on a request made during the weekly WebGL teleconference, I'm
>> reposting a list of spec changes we think are necessary to get WebGL
>> implemented on top of D3D9.  Please let me know if you have any strong
>> preferences regarding the options for #1 and #4.
>> ****
>> With great input from Daniel Koch of TransGaming we compiled a list of
>> proposed modifications to the WebGL spec that will allow for a reasonable
>> implementation of the API on top of Direct3D 9.0.  Please take a look and
>> let me know if there are any objections to the proposed changes or stuff
>> we've missed:
>> 1. Restrict allowable arguments to stencilMaskSeparate and
>> stencilFuncSeparate.  The underlying issue here is that D3D9 isn't as
>> flexible as GL when it comes to supplying different stencil masks and
>> functions to front and back facing triangles. More specifically here's a
>> listing of the GL stencil related functions/parameters and what portions can
>> be supported via D3D9:
>> Stencil Separate (Write) Mask:
>> void StencilMask( uint mask );
>> void StencilMaskSeparate( enum face, uint mask );
>>     mask ==> D3DRS_STENCILWRITEMASK  (no FRONT/BACK support)
>> There is no equivalent separate mask state in D3D.  Spec change:
>> a)  Remove StencilMaskSeparate.  -or-
>> b)  StencilMaskSeparate returns INVALID_VALUE if face is not
>> FRONT_AND_BACK. -or-
>> c)  Draw returns INVALID_OPERATION if FRONT mask != BACK mask.
>> Stencil Function Separate Ref & Mask:
>> void StencilFunc( enum func, int ref, uint mask );
>> void StencilFuncSeparate( enum face, enum func, int ref, uint mask );
>>     FRONT func ==> D3DRS_STENCILFUNC
>>     BACK func ==> D3DRS_CCW_STENCILFUNC
>>     ref ==> D3DRS_STENCILREF  (no FRONT/BACK support)
>>     mask ==> D3DRS_STENCILMASK (no FRONT/BACK support)
>> In D3D there is separate stencil state for func, but not for ref and mask.
>>  Separate func is genuinely useful, and thus removing StencilFuncSeparate is
>> not a good option.  Spec change: Draw returns INVALID_OPERATION if FRONT ref
>>  != BACK ref or FRONT mask != BACK mask.
>> Stencil Separate Operation:
>> void StencilOp( enum sfail, enum dpfail, enum dppass );
>> void StencilOpSeparate( enum face, enum sfail, enum dpfail, enum dppass );
>>     FRONT sfail ==> D3DRS_STENCILFAIL
>>     BACK sfail ==>  D3DRS_CCW_STENCILFAIL
>>     FRONT dpfail ==> D3DRS_STENCILZFAIL
>>     BACK dpfail ==> D3DRS_CCW_STENCILZFAIL
>>     FRONT dppass ==> D3DRS_STENCILPASS
>>     BACK dppass ==> D3DRS_CCW_STENCILPASS
>> D3D has corresponding state for all of these, so no changes are required
>> for this.
>> 2. Limit vertex stride to 255. Spec change:  vertexAttribPointer raises a
>> GL_INVALID_VALUE error if stride parameter value exceeds 255.
>> 3. Viewport depth range.  D3D doesn't support  "far < near", and this
>> would be very annoying to have to emulate. I believe there was buy-in at the
>> F2F to limit valid parameters to glDepthRangef to  "near <= far".   Spec
>>  change:   glDepthRangef returns GL_INVALID_OPERATION if f < n.
>> 4. Conflicting constant color usage. In D3D we can't directly support
>> alpha blending for the cases where the source blend function is set to
>> GL_CONSTANT_ALPHA (or GL_ONE_MINUS_CONSTANT_ALPHA), and the destination
>> blend function is set to GL_CONSTANT_COLOR, or vice versa. That's because
>> GL_CONSTANT_ALPHA has no D3D9 equivalent and if we replicate the alpha to
>> the RGB components we can no longer use the RGB components for the other
>> blend function.  Spec change:
>>   a) completely remove support for GL_CONSTANT_ALPHA and
>> ONE_MINUS_CONSTANT_ALPHA (ie return GL_INVALID_VALUE), -or-
>>   b) glBlendFunc/Separate sets GL_INVALID_OPERATION if a source function
>> is GL_CONSTANT_ALPHA or GL_ONE_MINUS_CONSTANT_ALPHA and the corresponding
>> destination function is GL_CONSTANT_COLOR or or GL_ONE_MINUS_CONSTANT_COLOR,
>> or vice versa.
>> 5. Shader invariance as described in GLSL ES spec
>> (http://www.khronos.org/registry/gles/specs/2.0/GLSL_ES_Specification_1.0.17.pdf)
>> sections 4.6.1 and enforced by the "invariant" qualifier and #pragma STDGL
>> invariant(all) cannot be guaranteed in D3D9.  Spec change: No guarantees are
>> made about invariance in shader outputs the invariant qualifier and #pragma
>> are ignored.
>

-----------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to public_webgl@khronos.org.
To unsubscribe, send an email to majordomo@khronos.org with
the following command in the body of your email: