[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Public WebGL] Move flipY and asPremultipliedAlpha parameters out of DOM helpers
On 2010-05-20 18:23, Gregg Tavares wrote:
As pointed out in a previous mail RGB and LUNIMANCE does differ in some
ways and the app can tell the difference. When you just sample the
textures they don't differ, but if you try to update a subregion of them
using texSubImage2D/copyTexSubImage2D it will fail if you specify the
wrong format where 'wrong' depends on the internal format of the
texture. You will also get different results if you bind to a FBO and
render to them.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Chris Marrin <firstname.lastname@example.org
On May 19, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Gregg Tavares wrote:
> What I don't get is why the need for these conversions? If you
load a grayscale image as RGB you'll get the same visual result as
LUMINANCE. So it seems like the valid reason to do these
conversions is for memory savings since you can always create RGB
or RGBA textures that will give you the same visual result.
I don't see how loading a grayscale as RGB is the same as
LUMINANCE. The OpenGL texturing engine deals with LUMINANCE
textures differently from RGB. The problem the information that an
original image was one channel is lost in the browser
implementations. Even if not (if the browsers were forced to pass
along the original image format information) implementations would
have to have internal format conversion to get the image into the
right format. So why not expose that to the author?
Can you point out the difference between an RGB image where R == G ==
B and a LUMINANCE texture? I'm unaware of this difference.
As far as I can tell there is no difference. There's also no
difference between an RGBA image were R == G == B and a
So arguably, the only point in providing the conversions is memory
savings. Otherwise there's no functional difference.
Technically that means it doesn't matter what the browser does. It can
upload a grayscale image as LUMINANCE or it can upload it as expanded
RGB. The WebGL program will not notice the difference. It won't even
be able query the difference.
So, the only reason the expose explicit conversions is for memory
savings. If that's the only reason then we should be going further.
Otherwise we shouldn't be exposing the conversions at all.
For that reason I don't think we should let to browser decide what
format to use, it must be specified which internal format is used. If we
do let the browser decide we need to block some operations on browser
determined formats or we will get incompatibilities.
You are currently subscribed to email@example.com.
To unsubscribe, send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org with
the following command in the body of your email: