[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Public WebGL] A Declarative node set for WebGL?
On Feb 25, 2010, at 3:31 PM, Len Bullard wrote:
> Don’t we already have multiple declarative formats that can be built over WebGL? What is the advantage of baking yet another one into WebGL itself? Because it maps more directly to the native WebGL data structures? Or because it has the WebGL object model baked into the declarative nodes?
I don't see this as "yet another 3D scene graph format" I see it as a declarative form of WebGL. If you accept the premise that WebGL is "a good thing" then I think its easier to see this as the logical companion.
> In VRML 2.0, the debate over object/markup impedance mismatching was long. However, it made the point that interoperability via data transfer (bits on the wire, as Bray says) is very limited particularly where rendering and behavioral fidelity have to be very strong across platforms.
> If I understand you, the main advantage of your proposal is the DOM scripting is simplified for those authors who want to instance and navigate directly in the WebGL objects. Is that right?
Again, I don't think it's as much simplification as it is more tightly tying into the native DOM and rendering facilities of the browser.
I see this node set as taking the "Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler" approach to a 3D declarative form.
You are currently subscribe to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe, send an email to email@example.com with
the following command in the body of your email: