I think "Experimental" would be better than "Draft." The latter
to me means a paper proposal. The former conveys that there are
implementations. Another possibility, maybe better, is
Having the numerical listing in reverse order feels a bit strange
but I expect I can get used to it.
Some appropriate borders may help to both separate the Official
and Prototype extensions and tie together the "By Number" and "By
Regarding the other thread on extension naming...
I'm not going to raise any further objections to the proposed
It would be nice if we could approve WEBGL_lose_context and
release it together with 1.0.1 so the the vendor decorated names
can be dispensed with.
Finally, I'd like to point out that automatic browser updates don
not make everything as rosy as Chris painted. Users can still
delay or decline updates and many will wait until extensions they
depend on have been updated to be compatible. Therefore
vendor-specific prefixes are not a complete solution for authors.
Probably sufficient but not complete.
Sorry for the delay, but these changes have been implemented: http://www.khronos.org/registry/webgl/extensions/ Thoughts?