[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Public WebGL] Volume Textures

GL_OES_texture_3D seems to be unsupported on current iOS hardware,
which means that content using that extension wouldn't be portable to
a significant percentage of mobile devices. For this reason there
currently is no plan to incorporate that extension into the WebGL
registry as a "core" extension. A browser vendor would be welcome to
add it as a vendor-specific extension.

That having been said, the WebGL spec aims to track the OpenGL ES
spec, and we anticipate a revision of the WebGL spec later this year
which is likely to add this functionality.


On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:44 PM, John Davis <jdavis@pcprogramming.com> wrote:
> Correct, but trilinear filtering in hardware is typically faster, and
> doesn't increase the instruction count.  Not to mention, it's also much
> easier to have trilinear filtering that just works rather than implementing
> it with 2D.
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Thatcher Ulrich <tu@tulrich.com> wrote:
>> It doesn't seem that hard to simulate a volume texture using a large
>> 2D texture.  Am I wrong?
>> -T
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:57 PM, John Davis <jdavis@pcprogramming.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Are any webgl implementations adding volume textures as an extension?
>> >  This
>> > is pretty key for those of us needing fast 3D noise.
>> > Any updates on VTL in Angle?
>> > JD
>> >

You are currently subscribed to public_webgl@khronos.org.
To unsubscribe, send an email to majordomo@khronos.org with
the following command in the body of your email:
unsubscribe public_webgl