[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Public WebGL] Re: Webp
- To: Kenneth Russell <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [Public WebGL] Re: Webp
- From: John Davis <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 05:27:25 -0600
- Cc: Patrick Baggett <email@example.com>, "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:reply-to:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Bv10RDKwEWse5/B3bmJ9WaTa9nSqgT6OMHZQl0JRDqc=; b=SOggBTCXWn5F6CpV8ItpfvUgpeBx30EsKdf1TTTcJ3/Toj04R8UtueOSWH0/QUaIN9 /EjxIBMF73G6j2AXBsuE7oDCD/MB00jO9nrqe9frMiBk2NCSoSNslJ2NsJp+TxSfrJK1 qE2emevSGI2fwJBrmuMFBSLp1q2KMCUa0SPbo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=huNKLuOdgrLtfdTh6prOVtevMmNfKsmWFlxMb+AYNLDPCdduzRIcLLiOK/VM7ShAAV E4wFKmjjO1mBlk+GfkvP5/rEU0FDuXYfG1ufHNG5yrCpPRAWa+U1+jC2SX6VSlNq0kVW B+KCdjdqVgjRytWtoEF8L7g4e0XlYlDZkviWU=
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTi=EPOPjM9yhK7z6f0rXPqM4xTGdPMHSToHmyerQ@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: Public WebGL Mailing List <public_webgl.khronos.org>
- References: <AANLkTi=VamonAa-fUuyKYtWUJf6h2jTDG9VrgDecpoKR@mail.gmail.com> <33475911.99316.1287410887932.JavaMail.firstname.lastname@example.org> <AANLkTimvpouL-xBDj-M_thFqqAy7-gq5WPiB5ri4XO44@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinXOLzrvmWOUQ5CarB6YbKunz-xhb7aKhDBaEuv@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTim69S=PBBfrE4D8V+YxqNVdOwqFTGcy6JN8m04N@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=EPOPjM9yhK7z6f0rXPqM4xTGdPMHSToHmyerQ@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: email@example.com
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
I see WebP is also supported in the Chrome 9 build, can it be used with WebGL for texturing?
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Kenneth Russell <email@example.com>
Actually, WebGL will not be on by default yet even in Chrome 8. We
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:43 AM, John Davis <firstname.lastname@example.org
> What started this whole thing is the claim that Webp is much better than jpeg.
> Btw, is webgl on by default in chrome7 or do we have to wait for chrome8?
expect it to be on by default in Chrome 9.
> On Wednesday, October 20, 2010, Patrick Baggett
>> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 6:33 AM, John Davis <email@example.com
>> I guess I'm asking the browser makers. Anything that cuts down on the bandwidth bill for texture maps being downloaded to end users is going to be a welcome feature. If people build MMOG's on this technology, compression of textures is going to be key.
>> Hate to ask the obvious question, but is there something wrong with PNGs or JPEGs? They both perform compression, and in the case of JPEG, offer space/quality trade-offs. Since you've moved outside the realm of real time compression/uncompression, why not settle on those -- the browser support is great as is the tool support to create them. You can even use nifty utilities like pngcrush.
>> I guess what I am trying to say is, unless there is compelling reason and amazing algorithm that really puts PNG and JPEG to shame, I don't see any reason that yet another image format would be desirable, and would likely just make the artists' lives more difficult (i.e. texture mapping a model using KTX file? Not likely to be supported)
> You are currently subscribed to firstname.lastname@example.org
> To unsubscribe, send an email to email@example.com
> the following command in the body of your email: