[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Public WebGL] Delay display of WebGL?
- To: stephen white <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: [Public WebGL] Delay display of WebGL?
- From: Steve Baker <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2010 10:51:32 -0600
- Cc: public webgl <email@example.com>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sjbaker.org; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sjbaker.org; bh=FLvuY PCMmAmfzw7PnRDdyMgmRTs=; b=LFZx/xaoa9NEvqfW3QTfBLvTHO5Jqw2UNiVsu rdbpY+nPRBuKFsg9dFF2yLFX91Ot/P957I961TjRDbBITn1R8WHlIqVOJ40ZSmvX LT+WcCDX+kV9MGfEp0gJRAlO7lqPThMyPxP8yin6Uq20XeTWdldTAVeIkJ19UBfZ oLGJ2o=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=sjbaker.org; h=message-id:date :from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sjbaker.org; b=d/AizTB82gRAOX6JaIfQX1AZhRcjr1340xBRU+P4gxfoSr1xlWN/HtiZH0j31 5JXIp9z18MooBv0CAyLx7BNgtPT/e6Npggj26EcA4v/KtuEw1gbtH3eLmYIoT1iA dTMDBMXFPbjqnspOHfpqu5rB7eFO2AhsBmcev7rvmDhfIg=
- In-reply-to: <8135F98E-9AED-4946-B1B3-C0CD9A772384@adam.com.au>
- References: <A0CA3A3D-D139-4E92-9F6D-D6E0236A4B14@adam.com.au> <4CE0037F.firstname.lastname@example.org> <8135F98E-9AED-4946-B1B3-C0CD9A772384@adam.com.au>
- Sender: email@example.com
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:126.96.36.199) Gecko/20100520 SUSE/3.0.5 Thunderbird/3.0.5
On 11/14/2010 09:57 AM, stephen white wrote:
> On 15/11/2010, at 2:12 AM, Steve Baker wrote:
>> Since the browser can't distinguish these use-cases, I'd strongly oppose
>> a feature that automatically shut down execution when a WebGL page is
>> hidden. It would have to be something that the app itself does voluntarily.
> Flash waits until it is the front window to start working, but it doesn't pause or stop playing once it's gotten started. That seems to be a reasonable compromise that has precedence.
I see how that helps your particular use pattern - but it doesn't help
many other situations. When I'm playing some heavy-duty game - then
need to go and check my web-mail or my FaceBook or something - I'd like
the thing running in the "background" tab to use as little CPU/GPU time
as possible. It can only do that if there is some kind of notification
that it's hidden.
If we need to add some new mechanism - then it ought to be more general
than the flash approach.
You are currently subscribed to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe, send an email to email@example.com with
the following command in the body of your email: