[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Public WebGL] Some WebGL draft feedback
On 12/23/09 7:54 PM, Chris Marrin wrote:
That API is basically an extension to the 2d API. It adds a few extra
functions, but adds them to a separate context instead of directly to
the 2d context. All the functions manipulate the 2d context, so
opera-2dgame makes little sense on it's own.
On Dec 23, 2009, at 2:53 AM, Gregg Tavares wrote:
2) Don't support multiple contexts.
That seems like bad choice given that there is already precedent and
it's extremely useful. If canvas is by design, a bucket of pixels
then it certainly makes sense that it would be possible to effect
those pixels in multiple ways and as more ways come up use them all
It would be quite useful to this discussion to understand that API
better. Have you used it to understand how well it works and where its
pitfalls are? Perhaps someone from Opera can enlighten us about the
We have not proposed multiple context. Instead we have proposed to add
the functionality of opera-2dgame to the main 2d context, which most of
it was several years ago.
3) Switch to a <webgl> tag instead of canvas.
I suspect this suggestion will be unpopular but it seems to me that
if canvas has a model and webgl is not willing to support that model
than it doesn't belong in canvas.
Canvas DOESN'T have a model. In the 3 years since Opera created their
proprietary API have they gone to the W3C to propose defining multiple
contexts in the Canvas element? If so, then we have a basis for
discussion. If not, we need to do that definition. My strong
recommendation is to disallow multiple contexts.
You are currently subscribe to firstname.lastname@example.org.
To unsubscribe, send an email to email@example.com with
the following command in the body of your email: