Difference between revisions of "Talk:User Wish List"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (moved Talk:Proposals to Talk:User Wish List: The term "Proposals" makes it sound legitimate. With a page like this, it is important to know that this is purely a wish list. And thus differentiate it from actual information.) |
(Explaining Undo.) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:True, but personally I still find this kind of pages useful to me (providing that they are actively maintained), because I don't have time to do such technology forecasting myself but I'm still interested in. Other people may be in the same situation. Maybe we could add a special tag or banner for those pages, explaining their different nature? (more 'community' than 'facts') --[[User:Dhe|dhe]] 07:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | :True, but personally I still find this kind of pages useful to me (providing that they are actively maintained), because I don't have time to do such technology forecasting myself but I'm still interested in. Other people may be in the same situation. Maybe we could add a special tag or banner for those pages, explaining their different nature? (more 'community' than 'facts') --[[User:Dhe|dhe]] 07:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
:: You should know that these aren't forecasts; they're what people want, not what people will get or anyone is promising. [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] 05:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC) | :: You should know that these aren't forecasts; they're what people want, not what people will get or anyone is promising. [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] 05:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == On Shader Load Store == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The requested functionality was with regard to normal writing from a fragment shader, using the framebuffer and so forth, not arbitrary writing to a texture. [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] 03:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:43, 14 April 2010
I would like to go on record as being strongly against the very existence of this page. I feel that its unverifiable nature makes it inappropriate for a fact-based wiki like this one. Alfonse 19:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- True, but personally I still find this kind of pages useful to me (providing that they are actively maintained), because I don't have time to do such technology forecasting myself but I'm still interested in. Other people may be in the same situation. Maybe we could add a special tag or banner for those pages, explaining their different nature? (more 'community' than 'facts') --dhe 07:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- You should know that these aren't forecasts; they're what people want, not what people will get or anyone is promising. Alfonse 05:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
On Shader Load Store
The requested functionality was with regard to normal writing from a fragment shader, using the framebuffer and so forth, not arbitrary writing to a texture. Alfonse 03:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)