Difference between revisions of "Talk:User Wish List"

From OpenGL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(On proposals.)
 
(Explaining Undo.)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I would like to go on record as being strongly against the very existence of this page. I feel that its unverifiable nature makes it inappropriate for a fact-based wiki like this one. [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] 19:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 
I would like to go on record as being strongly against the very existence of this page. I feel that its unverifiable nature makes it inappropriate for a fact-based wiki like this one. [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] 19:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
:True, but personally I still find this kind of pages useful to me (providing that they are actively maintained), because I don't have time to do such technology forecasting myself but I'm still interested in. Other people may be in the same situation. Maybe we could add a special tag or banner for those pages, explaining their different nature? (more 'community' than 'facts') --[[User:Dhe|dhe]] 07:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
:: You should know that these aren't forecasts; they're what people want, not what people will get or anyone is promising. [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] 05:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== On Shader Load Store ==
 +
 +
The requested functionality was with regard to normal writing from a fragment shader, using the framebuffer and so forth, not arbitrary writing to a texture. [[User:Alfonse|Alfonse]] 03:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 03:43, 14 April 2010

I would like to go on record as being strongly against the very existence of this page. I feel that its unverifiable nature makes it inappropriate for a fact-based wiki like this one. Alfonse 19:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

True, but personally I still find this kind of pages useful to me (providing that they are actively maintained), because I don't have time to do such technology forecasting myself but I'm still interested in. Other people may be in the same situation. Maybe we could add a special tag or banner for those pages, explaining their different nature? (more 'community' than 'facts') --dhe 07:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
You should know that these aren't forecasts; they're what people want, not what people will get or anyone is promising. Alfonse 05:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

On Shader Load Store

The requested functionality was with regard to normal writing from a fragment shader, using the framebuffer and so forth, not arbitrary writing to a texture. Alfonse 03:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)