Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: FCollada vs Collada DOM

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2008

    FCollada vs Collada DOM

    I was hoping someone could provide a comparison between the FCollada and Collada DOM APIs.

    So far I understand that FCollada is simpler, but does that mean its lacking features?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Foster City, CA
    I can't analyze FCollada because I haven't worked with it much, but let me share what I consider to be the strengths and weaknesses of the DOM.

    • Free and open source[/*:m:nxcw20t5]
    • Cross platform (Windows static lib/dll, Linux static/shared lib, Mac framework, PS3 static lib)[/*:m:nxcw20t5]
    • Responsive support (me!)[/*:m:nxcw20t5]
    • Much easier to use than it used to be (2.0 has tons of usability improvements)[/*:m:nxcw20t5]
    • Supports every element in Collada[/*:m:nxcw20t5]
    • Type system makes some code awkward to write[/*:m:nxcw20t5]
    • Doesn't support working with multiple versions of the Collada schema in the same app[/*:m:nxcw20t5]
    • Somewhat strange naming scheme (DAE, daeElement, domNode, domFx_sampler2D_common)[/*:m:nxcw20t5]
    • Binaries are pretty big for what it actually provides in functionality[/*:m:nxcw20t5]

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts