Talk:Portal:Extensions directory

Alternative format to what's currently in the article

1. Look at Extension directory/temp.
2. Compare with the format of what's currently in the article.
3. Read "Comparisons", below, and add additional notes if desired.
4. Vote and comment on which you prefer.

Thanks. Elf 19:00, 12 May 2007 (PDT)

Comparisons

Format mentioned above:

• Pro: If there are a lot of companies registering extensions, will make it easier to find extensions by each of the different categories.
• Con: Same link appears in multiple places, so takes longer to insert a new one and harder to maintain.

Current article format (single table):

• Pro: Link in only one place, so faster and easier to insert new one and to maintain list.
• Pro: Easier to read.
• Con: Table is arranged only by company name, so if there are a lot of companies with extensions, it's harder to view the list of profile names and of extensions by element.

Votes and comments

Which do you prefer, and why??

• Current article format (single table)
  • Easier to read. Simpler to add to. Elf 19:27, 12 May 2007 (PDT)
  • Because blah. signherewithfourtildes
• Format mentioned above (3 separate sections)
  • Because blah. signherewithfourtildes