Khronos Public Bugzilla
Bug 407 - Add support for LUMINANCE16 as an extension
Add support for LUMINANCE16 as an extension
Status: NEW
Product: WebGL
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Specification
1.0
PC All
: P3 normal
: ---
Assigned To: 3dweb Working Group email alias
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2011-01-13 03:21 PST by Kostas Karolemeas
Modified: 2011-01-13 13:12 PST (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kostas Karolemeas 2011-01-13 03:21:53 PST
In several applications ranging from medical imaging to terrain modeling, original data to be visualized consist of single channel (grayscale) maps and require more than 8 bits for usable precision. In these cases LUMINANCE16 is required as a format and UNSIGNED_SHORT as a datatype for textures.

Since WebGL targets span from mobile devices to powerful graphics workstations, support for LUMINANCE16 should be offered as an extension that will be initially available only on desktops and power laptops.

The workaround to this is to "encode" 16-bit values into 4- or 8-bit channels but this results to significant performance overhead since values need to be "decoded" in shaders. Additionally, filtering needs also to be implemented in shader code.
Comment 1 Kenneth Russell 2011-01-13 12:23:41 PST
Does the OES_texture_float extension not address this use case (potentially at the expense of more GPU memory)? This extension is portable to mobile hardware, where support for the GL_LUMINANCE16 internal format would not be. WebGL follows the OpenGL ES 2.0 texture specification rules, where the format and internal format must currently be identical.

Chromium and Safari already offer support for the OES_texture_float extension in WebGL.
Comment 2 vladimir 2011-01-13 13:12:02 PST
I think the problem is that the original source data is already in L16 format.  To use texture_float, it would have to be converted to floating point first, before being uploaded to GL.  However, the browser would take care of that in the case of texImage2D with an image element, so it probably wouldn't be that big of a nissue, other than the added memory usage.