Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: uniform OMX IL implementation

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5

    uniform OMX IL implementation

    Hi,
    From OMX IL spec, it seems that OMX core and OMX component are tied closey with each other. Suppose one has a set of OMX core and compatible OMX component. Now if he wants to integrate 3rd party OMX component (working in some other OMX core implementation) he has to do some modifications the that component. Also this is possible only if he has access to source code.
    What could be the easiest solution to this? Bellagio is open source OMX IL implementation. Is it used widely across developers? or everybody has own proprietary implemenation?

    Regards,
    Viraj

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5

    Re: uniform OMX IL implementation


  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    California, USA
    Posts
    51

    Re: uniform OMX IL implementation

    Quote Originally Posted by virajk
    From OMX IL spec, it seems that OMX core and OMX component are tied closey with each other. Suppose one has a set of OMX core and compatible OMX component. Now if he wants to integrate 3rd party OMX component (working in some other OMX core implementation) he has to do some modifications the that component. Also this is possible only if he has access to source code.
    What could be the easiest solution to this? Bellagio is open source OMX IL implementation. Is it used widely across developers? or everybody has own proprietary implemenation?
    The working group took the view that we could not mandate how components are dynamically discovered and loaded, as it is inherently platform-specific. We did mandate how staically linked components are exposed to the IL core.

    The abscense of a mandated approach for dynamic discovery and loading does not prevent IL core and component implementers from giving the details of how to integrate their core / components with other components / cores. This would usually be required by platform integraters. At worst, this would allow stub components (that load the real components) to be registered with, and loaded by, the core. Obviously any component-core interaction outside the scope of the IL standard would be problematic.

    Thanks,

    Roger
    Roger Nixon, Broadcom Corporation

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    5

    Re: uniform OMX IL implementation

    Thanks for the reply Roger.

    Regards,
    Viraj

Similar Threads

  1. getUniformLocation: is uniform exists or not.
    By sphere in forum WebGL - General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-21-2010, 05:15 AM
  2. uniform OMX IL implementation
    By virajk in forum OpenMAX
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-01-1970, 12:00 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •