Search:

Type: Posts; User: SteveYoungs

Search: Search took 0.00 seconds.

  1. Replies
    3
    Views
    1,511

    Re: C++ Binding Enhancements

    Logged in bugzilla here:

    http://www.khronos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=490
  2. Replies
    3
    Views
    1,511

    C++ Binding Enhancements

    Hi,
    I'd like to suggest an enhancement to the C++ bindings to aid usability.
    Currently there are several member functions that take a vector of devices. For example:


    Context(const...
  3. Replies
    99
    Views
    64,895

    Re: OpenCL C++ Bindings

    Is there any update KernelFunctor ignoring waitEvents issue mentioned in May 2010 in this post

    http://www.khronos.org/message_boards/viewtopic.php?p=7215#p7215

    I just hit the same problem in my...
  4. Replies
    3
    Views
    1,419

    Re: OpenCL Language Clarification

    Just a quick update for anyone that reads this going forwards:

    I've had ongoing discussion with AMD on this issue and they have said

    "After further discussing this internally, this will not be...
  5. Replies
    3
    Views
    1,764

    Multi Platform Contexts

    Hi,
    Is it supported to make a single context over a multiple cl_device_ids which in turn span multiple cl_platform_ids?

    When I try under Windows, it fails with either an access violation or...
  6. Replies
    3
    Views
    1,419

    Re: OpenCL Language Clarification

    Thanks, that was my reading of the spec too.
    I actually used

    if ((a.s0 != 0) && (a.s1 != 0) && (a.s2 != 0))

    I'll go back to AMD with this clarification.

    Thanks
  7. Replies
    3
    Views
    1,419

    OpenCL Language Clarification

    Hi,
    I'm seeking clarification of section 6.3, clause g of the OpenCL spec 1.1 rev 36
    Given the following kernel

    __kernel void test()
    {
    float3 a;
    if (a.s0 && a.s1 && a.s2)
    {
    }
Results 1 to 7 of 8