PDA

View Full Version : C++ bindings 1.2 incompatible with PGI 12



rothpc
09-20-2012, 07:32 AM
The OpenCL C++ bindings version 1.2 use a GCC builtin (__sync_val_compare_and_swap) that is not provided by the PGI C++ compiler for x86/x86_64 Linux. (Apparently, some other compiler vendors such as Intel do provide it for compatibility.)

Has anyone found a reasonable workaround? My attempts to provide an implementation of this builtin as a function (inlined or otherwise) causes the templated method that uses the builtin to be outlined, leading to multiply-defined symbol link errors in the code I'm working on.

chippies
09-22-2012, 09:36 AM
Would defining __sync_val_compare_and_swap as a macro help at all? I don't work with OpenCL 1.2 as I target both Nvidia and AMD so I have no experience there.

rothpc
10-04-2012, 11:49 AM
I replied a few days ago but apparently didn't hit the right button to submit.

I tried defining __sync_val_compare_and_swap as a macro and as a C++ inline function. In both cases, the class method in the C++ bindings that uses the __sync_val_compare_and_swap builtin ended up being outlined. Since the code I'm working with includes the C++ bindings header from several source files, this meant link errors due to multiply defined symbols for this outlined function.

I don't understand why the compiler decided to outline that function - I don't think it should have, but I couldn't figure out a way to keep it from outlining it.

I may be stuck just modifying all our code to remove use of the C++ bindings. That would be disappointing, since overall I like the way the C++ bindings increase the level of abstraction when programming for OpenCL devices.

chippies
10-05-2012, 07:48 AM
Looking at the Khronos website, there is no official cl.hpp for OpenCL 1.2. They are still linking to the 1.1 cl.hpp. Can you get by with OpenCL 1.1?